|
Shakespeare a Lawyer - Part Two
"Stray, Estrays (Extrahurae) are cattle that stray into another man's ground and not own'd by any man. In this case, if they are proclaimed on two market days in two several towns next adjoining, and the owner doth not claim them within a year and a day, they belong to the Lord of the Liberty."Finch,177; Kitch, 80, 81; Bacon Elem, 76, 77; Wood's Institute, 2d edition, p. 213.
An estate in fee-tail (from tailler, to cut or limit) is that inheritance whereof one is seized to him and the heirs of his body, begotten or to be begotten.Litt, s. 18; Wood's Institute, 2nd edition, p. 120. An estate in remainder is the residue of an estate, in land, depending
upon a particular estate, and created together with the same. A particular
estate is that which is derived from a general and greater estate.-Wood's
Institute, 2nd edition, p. 149.
[14] An estate in reversion (from reverto, to return) is where any estate is derived, by grant or otherwise, out of a larger one, leaving in the original owner an ulterior estate immediately expectant on that which is so derived; the latter interest is called the particular estate, (that is only a small part or particula of the original one), and the ulterior interest the reversion.
The description of an individual in a legal document, as esquire, gentleman, yeoman, &c., is called his addition.
In the days of Jack Cade few could read, except those who were actually in orders, or educated for that purpose:
so that if a person was arraigned before a temporal judge for any crime (the punishment whereof was death) he might pray his clergy; that was, to have a Latin Bible in a black Gothic character delivered to him; and if he could read a passage where the judge appointed, which was generally in the Psalms, the ordinary, or his deputy, who stood near, said, legit ut clericus, that is, he could read like a clerk or scholar, and the criminal was acquitted as being a man of learning, who might therefore be useful to the public; if, however, he could not read, he suffered death. This privilege was granted in all offences, except high treason and sacrilege, until after the year 1530; and it was carried to such an extent, that if a criminal was condemned at one assize, and was reprieved to the subsequent assize, because he could not read, he might again claim this benefit, either at that time, or even under the gallow's tree, and if he could then read, he was pardoned, of which there was an instance in the reign of Queen Elizabeth. Although this privilege was originally enjoyed only by those who had the habitum et tonsuram clericalem, who wore the clerical habit and were trimmed with the clerical [16] tonsure; yet the ability to read being formerly a mark of great erudition, every one thus qualified, in course of time, was considered a clerk, or clericus, and allowed the benefit of clergy, although not in holy order. So that, ultimately, as many laymen as clergy men enjoyed this privilege, which excited the jealousy of the clergy, in whose favour, therefore, a further distinction was made, by stat. 4th Henry VII, chap. 13, in the year 1487, "Whereas upon trust of the privilege of the church, divers persons lettered have been the more bold to commit murder, rape, robbery, theft, and all other mischievious deeds, because they have been continually admitted to the benefit of the clergy as oft as they did offend in any of the premises; it is enacted, ordained, and established, by the authority of this present parliament, that every person, not being within orders, which once hath been admitted to the benefit of his clergy, eftsoons arraigned of any such offence, be not admitted to have the benefit or privilege of his clergy; and that every person so convicted for murder, to be marked with an M upon the braun of the left thumb; and if he be for any other felony, the same person to be marked with a T in the same place of the thumb, and those marks to be made by the gaoler openly in the court before the judge, before that such person be delivered to the ordinary."
Hence, probably, the origin of the request made even at the present time, when a prisoner is arraigned, "Prisoner at the bar, hold up your hand," in order, if he was a [17] layman, that it might thereby be ascertained whether he had been admitted to this privilege before. The benefit of clergy first legally recognized by stat. 3rd Edward I, A.D. 1274, modified in 1530, in the time of Henry VIII, was wholly repealed by the 7th and 8th Geo. IV, June, 1827.
A deed indented consists of two or more parts: for there are deeds Bipartate, of two parts; Tripartate, of three; Quadrupartate, of four; Quinquepartate, of five; and Sextipartate, of six, &c. In which respective deeds it is expressed, that the parties thereunto have interchangeably set their hands and seals.
An indenture is so called because each part used formerly to be cut or indented in acute angles (instar dentium, or like the teeth of a saw) on the top, or side, to tally or correspond with the other,?(Vide Co. Litt., 47 b; Litt., s. 371.) The history of the practice of indenting is given in Co. Litt., by Butler, 269, A.N. (1.) Formerly, when deeds were more concise than at present, it was usual to write both parts on the same piece of parchment, with same word or letters of the alphabet written between them, through which the parchment was cut, either in a straight or indented line, so as to leave half the word on one part and half on the other. But for a long time past the practice [18] of cutting through any letters has, in all other instances, been disused; and even of indenting saw-wise, the modern method being to cut the top of the parchment in a waving line. Neither this, however, nor any other method of indenting is in general necessary to the legal validity of the instrument.
When the several parts of an indenture are interchangeably executed by the several parties, that part or copy which is executed by the grantor is usually called the original, and the rest are counterparts; though, of late, it is most frequent for all the parties to execute every part, which renders them all originals.
The bills Rosalind mentions are deeds poll, which commonly being Know all men by these presents, or To all whom these presents shall come, and are made by one partly only, and not indented, but polled or shaved quite even, and therefore called a deed poll, or single deed.Mirror, c. 2, s. 27; Litt., s. 371, 372; Gardiner v. Lachlan.
An obligation, according to our common law, is a bond containing a penalty, with a condition for payment [19] of money; or to do or suffer some act or thing, c. If it is without condition, it is called a bill, which is sometimes with a penalty, and then it is called a penal bill, or simple bond. (1 Inst., 172a; 3 Cro., 515; 2 Roll, abr., 146; wood's Institute, 2nd ed., p. 288.) An obligation, or bond, is a deed whereby the obligor obliges himself, his heirs, executors, or administrators, to pay a certain sum of money to another at a day appointed. If this be all, the bond is a single one, simplex obligatio.
But a condition is generally added, that if the obligor does some particular act, the obligation shall be void, as performance of covenants, or repayment of a principal sum borrowed of the obligee, with interest, which sum is usually one-half of the penal sum named in the bond.
Bonds, with conditions of this kind annexed, have been long in use, and in former times on a conditional bond becoming forfeited for non-payment of the money borrowed, the whole penalty, usually double the principal sum lent by the obligee, was recoverable. (Litt., S. 40.) So Macbeth says:
[20] Referring not to a single, but to a conditional bond, under or by virtue of which, when forfeited, double the principal sum was recoverable.
Purchase (perquisitio) has in law a meaning more extended than its ordinary significance. It is possession to which a man cometh not by title of descent. (Litt., s. 12.) It is contradistinguished from acquisition by right of blood, and includes every other method of coming to an estate whatever, than that by inheritance, wherein the title is vested in a person by single operation of the law. (1 Inst. 18.) Accordingly, a devisee under a will is now a purchaser in law. In these passages the word purchase is used by Shakespeare in its strict legal sense, in contradistinction to an acquisition by descent, although purchase was, in Shakespeare's day, sometimes used to signify robbery, and also the thing stolen:
"Tenant in dower is where a man is seized of lands or tenements in fee-simple, fee-tail general, or as heir in special tail, and taketh a wife, and dieth; the wife, after the decease of her husband, shall be endowed of the third part of such lands and tenements as were her husband's at any time during the coverture, to have and to hold to the same wife in severalty, by metes and bounds, for term of her life, whether she hath issue by her husband or no, and of what age soever the wife be, so as she be past the age of nine years at the time of the death of her husband, otherwise she shall not be endowed." (Litt., s. 36.) "And note, that by the common law the wife shall have for her dower but the third part of the tenements which were her husband's during the espousals; but, by the custom of some country, she shall have the half, and, by the custom in some town or borough, she shall have the whole; and in all these cases she shall be called tenant in dower." (Litt., s. 37.) Widowhood, a term only used now as descriptive of the state of being a widow, signified the estate settled on a widow. Petruchio says he will assure Katherina of a widow's portion in all his "lands and leases," and not "bar dower" by fine and recovery. "Also, there be two other kinds of dower, viz., dower called dowment at the church door, and dower called dowment by the father's assent."Litt., s. 38.
Dowment at the church door (dower ad ostium ecclesiae) is where a man of full age seized in fee-simply who shall be married to a woman, and when he cometh to the church door to be married, there, after affiance and troth plighted between them, he endoweth the woman of his whole land, or of the half, or other lesser part thereof, there openly doth declare the quantity and the certainty of the land which she shall have for her dower. In this case the wife, after the death of which her husband, may enter into the said quantity of land of which her husband endowed her without other assignment of any.Litt. s. 39.
Baptista seems to refer to dowment by the father's assent (dower ex assensu patis) which is where the father is seized of tenements in fee, and his son and heir apparent, when he is married, endoweth his wife at the monastery or church door, of parcel of his father's lands or tenements with the assent of his father, and assigns the quantity and parcels. In this case, after the death of the son, the wife shall enter into the same parcel without the assignment of anyLitt. s. 40. |
Copyright © 2001 by Mark Alexander.
All Rights Reserved. SOURCETEXT, SHARETEXT,
SOURCETEXT.COM, SHARETEXT.COM, THE
SHAKESPEARE AUTHORSHIP SOURCEBOOK,
THE SHAKESPEARE LAW LIBRARY, THE
HU PAGE, THE
SCHOOL OF PYTHAGORAS
and others are trademarked 1997, 1998, 1999, and 2000 by
Mark Alexander, P. O. Box 620008, Woodside, CA 94062-0008.
SourceText.Com and ShareText.Com are
divisions of
Breeze Productions, P.O. Box 620008, Woodside, CA 94062-0008.